Legal Claims
Roundup Lawsuit
If you were regularly exposed to Roundup weedkiller and were later diagnosed with non-Hodgkin lymphoma, you may qualify for compensation.
Stay Informed
What's behind the Roundup claims?
Roundup is a widely used weedkiller made by Monsanto (now owned by Bayer) whose active ingredient, glyphosate, is the subject of thousands of lawsuits. Plaintiffs allege long-term exposure to Roundup is linked to non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and that Monsanto failed to warn users of the risk.
As of mid-2026, thousands of Roundup cases remain pending in both federal multidistrict litigation and state courts, even after Monsanto has already settled roughly two-thirds of all claims filed to date.
Who this may affect
- Regular or occupational exposure to Roundup (farmers, landscapers, groundskeepers, home gardeners with frequent use)
- Diagnosed with non-Hodgkin lymphoma
- Exposure occurred before the diagnosis, generally by a period of months or years
How this works
Here's what happens after you reach out:
01
Quick questions
A short set of free eligibility questions about your situation — takes about two minutes.
02
Free review
Our network reviews your answers against current qualifying criteria and reaches out if you may qualify.
03
No obligation
You decide whether to move forward. There's never a cost to check your eligibility.
Where things stand
As of July 2026, there are roughly 3,900 Roundup lawsuits pending in the federal MDL (N.D. Cal., Judge Vince Chhabria), with thousands more in state courts. Monsanto has reached settlements in nearly 100,000 cases totaling about $11 billion, but an estimated 61,000 claims remain active. A contested $7.25 billion proposed class settlement for future claims received preliminary approval in Missouri state court in March 2026. Separately, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Monsanto v. Durnell on April 27, 2026 — a ruling is still pending and could significantly affect whether failure-to-warn claims can proceed nationwide.
Frequently asked questions
How could the Supreme Court case affect my claim?
Monsanto v. Durnell, argued before the Supreme Court in April 2026, could determine whether Roundup failure-to-warn claims are allowed to proceed under federal law. A ruling is still pending as of this writing — it's one of the most consequential open questions in this litigation right now.
Recent news
R
Atumio on 2026-10-21
Judge Vince Chhabria has invited amicus briefs on whether the Supreme Court's June 2026 Monsanto v. Durnell decision also preempts negligence, design defect and warranty claims in six states, a question that could decide the fate of many remaining federal Roundup cases.
Read more →
J
Atumio on 2026-10-12
A federal judge in Idaho dismissed former NFL player Merril Hoge's Roundup failure-to-warn claim in light of the Supreme Court's preemption ruling, but let his negligence and design-defect claims proceed toward a jury.
Read more →
F
Atumio on 2026-10-05
A St. Louis jury began hearing the first Roundup trial since the Supreme Court's June 2026 ruling for Bayer, as three women outside the proposed $7.25 billion settlement press design-defect claims while the settlement still awaits a judge's decision.
Read more →
Atumio is a marketing/referral service, not a law firm, and this page is not legal advice.